FxRobotEasy рд╕рдВрдкрд╛рджрдХреАрдп ┬╖ рдЕрдВрддрд┐рдо рд╕рдореАрдХреНрд╖рд╛
Conservative Multi-EA Portfolio тАФ 14 Months Running 3 EAs on $25K
рдЙрджрд╛рд╣рд░рдгрд╛рддреНрдордХ рд╕рдВрдорд┐рд╢реНрд░ рдкрд░рд┐рджреГрд╢реНрдп: рдпрд╣ рдХреЗрд╕ рд╕реНрдЯрдбреА FxRobotEasy рдЙрдкрдпреЛрдЧрдХрд░реНрддрд╛ рдЖрдзрд╛рд░ рдкрд░ рджреЗрдЦреЗ рдЧрдП рдкреНрд░рддрд┐рдирд┐рдзрд┐ рдкрд░рд┐рдгрд╛рдо рдкреИрдЯрд░реНрди рдХрд╛ рд╡рд░реНрдгрди рдХрд░рддреА рд╣реИред рдЯреНрд░реЗрдбрд░ рдЙрдкрдирд╛рдо, рд╕рдВрдЦреНрдпрд╛рдПрдБ рдФрд░ рдХрдерд╛ рдПрдХрд▓ рдирд╛рдорд┐рдд рдЦрд╛рддреЗ рдХреЗ рдмрдЬрд╛рдп рд╕рдВрдорд┐рд╢реНрд░ рд╣реИрдВред рд╡рд╛рд╕реНрддрд╡рд┐рдХ рд╕рддреНрдпрд╛рдкрд┐рдд рд▓рд╛рдЗрд╡ рдЯреНрд░реЗрдбрд┐рдВрдЧ рдбреЗрдЯрд╛ рд╣рдорд╛рд░реЗ /live-trading рдбреИрд╢рдмреЛрд░реНрдб рдкрд░ Myfxbook рд╕рд┐рдВрдбрд┐рдХреЗрд╢рди рдХреЗ рд╕рд╛рде рдкреНрд░рдХрд╛рд╢рд┐рдд рд╣реЛрддреЗ рд╣реИрдВред рдЯреНрд░реЗрдбрд░ рдЕрдиреБрдорддрд┐рдпреЛрдВ рдХреЗ рджрд╕реНрддрд╛рд╡реЗрдЬрд╝реАрдХрд░рдг рдХреЗ рд╕рд╛рде-рд╕рд╛рде рд╡реНрдпрдХреНрддрд┐рдЧрдд CRM-рд╡реНрдпреБрддреНрдкрдиреНрди рдЕрдзреНрдпрдпрди рдЗрди рдЙрджрд╛рд╣рд░рдгрд╛рддреНрдордХ рд╕рдВрд╕реНрдХрд░рдгреЛрдВ рдХреЛ рдмрджрд▓ рджреЗрдВрдЧреЗред
рдкреНрд░рд╛рд░рдВрднрд┐рдХ рдЬрдорд╛
$25,000
рдЕрдВрддрд┐рдо рд╢реЗрд╖
$31,000
рдХреБрд▓ рд░рд┐рдЯрд░реНрди
+24.0%
рдЕрдзрд┐рдХрддрдо рдбреНрд░реЙрдбрд╛рдЙрди
-5.8%
рдЬреАрдд рджрд░
54%
Profit factor
1.66
рдЯреНрд░реЗрдбрд░ рдкреНрд░реЛрдлрд╝рд╛рдЗрд▓
рдЙрдкрдирд╛рдо: Trader S. (рд╕рдВрдорд┐рд╢реНрд░, рдЕрдирд╛рдореАрдХреГрдд)
рджреЗрд╢: Switzerland
рдмреНрд░реЛрдХрд░: Two Swiss-regulated brokers тАФ Trendopedia + Breakopedia on one (low overall spread), Scalperology on the second (tighter gold spread)
рдЕрд╡рдзрд┐: 14 months
рдЕрд╡рдзрд┐: March 2024 тАУ May 2025
EA(s): trendopedia, breakopedia, scalperology
Trader S. manages a small algorithmic trading allocation as part of a larger investment portfolio. Specifically chose multi-EA diversification over single-EA concentration to test whether strategy diversification could reduce drawdown without proportional return loss. The 14-month track is part of an ongoing operation.
рдорд╣реАрдиреЗ-рджрд░-рдорд╣реАрдиреЗ рдЗрдХреНрд╡рд┐рдЯреА рдкреНрд░рдЧрддрд┐
| рдорд╣реАрдирд╛ | рдкреНрд░рд╛рд░рдВрдн | рдЕрдВрдд | P&L % | DD % | рдЯреНрд░реЗрдб | рдиреЛрдЯреНрд╕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2024 | $25,000 | $25,380 | +1.5% | 1.4% | 38 | Setup month тАФ capital allocation 40/40/20 |
| Jun 2024 | $26,010 | $26,680 | +2.6% | 2.3% | 47 | All three EAs contributing |
| Aug 2024 | $27,040 | $27,420 | +1.4% | 3.2% | 41 | Trendopedia chop offset by Scalperology |
| Oct 2024 | $27,680 | $27,310 | -1.3% | 4.5% | 36 | Breakopedia chop, others holding |
| Nov 2024 | $27,310 | $26,900 | -1.5% | 5.8% | 39 | Worst month тАФ Scalperology Nov DD coincided |
| Jan 2025 | $27,580 | $28,640 | +3.8% | 2.6% | 52 | Strong recovery across portfolio |
| Mar 2025 | $29,250 | $30,180 | +3.2% | 3.1% | 49 | Trendopedia driving gains |
| May 2025 | $30,680 | $31,000 | +1.0% | 2.4% | 43 | Steady finish |
рд╕рд░реНрд╡рд╢реНрд░реЗрд╖реНрда рдЙрджрд╛рд╣рд░рдгрд╛рддреНрдордХ рдЯреНрд░реЗрдб
January 2025: LONG XAUUSD
рдкрд░рд┐рдгрд╛рдо: +198 pips (+3.9R)
Scalperology entry during London/NY overlap on sustained momentum. Concurrent Trendopedia gold position (sized smaller) added to the day's overall gain.
рд╕рдмрд╕реЗ рдЦрд░рд╛рдм рдЙрджрд╛рд╣рд░рдгрд╛рддреНрдордХ рдЯреНрд░реЗрдб
November 2024: SHORT XAUUSD
рдкрд░рд┐рдгрд╛рдо: тИТ55 pips (тИТ1R)
Scalperology short signal during chop regime; standard 1R loss. This was a normal losing trade within the strategy's expected distribution, not a system failure.
рдХреНрдпрд╛ рдХрд╛рдо рдХрд┐рдпрд╛
Strategy diversification produced a structurally lower DD profile than any single EA. Trendopedia's 6-10% solo DD range and Scalperology's 12-22% solo DD range averaged to 5.8% peak in the diversified portfolio тАФ better than either EA alone.
Capital allocation 40% Trendopedia / 40% Breakopedia / 20% Scalperology balanced trade frequency. The lower Scalperology allocation reduced exposure to its higher per-trade volatility while still capturing its uncorrelated returns.
Running on two brokers reduced single-broker concentration risk. The two-broker setup added operational complexity but provided protection against any single broker's execution issues, technical outages, or regulatory problems.
рдХреНрдпрд╛ рдХрд╛рдо рдирд╣реАрдВ рдХрд┐рдпрд╛ / рд╕реБрдзрд╛рд░ рд╕рдХрддрд╛ рд╣реИ
Total return of 24% over 14 months is below what any single EA would have produced solo (Trendopedia ~25%, Breakopedia ~30%, Scalperology ~35% during the same period). Diversification reduces variance but also reduces expected return at the headline level.
Operational complexity increased meaningfully тАФ two brokers, three EAs, separate parameter management, separate VPS configurations. The simplicity benefit of running one EA was lost. For traders without significant operational comfort, this complexity offsets the DD reduction.
рдкрд╛рдардХреЛрдВ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рд╕рдмрдХ
1. Diversification reduces variance, not necessarily improves return
The Sharpe ratio improved (1.9 vs ~1.5 for individual EAs) but headline return dropped. Diversification is a risk-management decision, not a return-enhancement decision. Pick based on whether you want lower DD variance or higher headline numbers.
2. Strategy class diversification matters more than pair diversification
Running the same strategy class (e.g. three trend-followers on different pairs) doesn't diversify well during major regime shifts. Diversifying across strategy classes (trend + breakout + scalping) addresses different failure modes and produces structural DD reduction.
3. Operational complexity has a price
Three EAs and two brokers requires substantially more management than a single setup. Traders who can't allocate 1-2 hours per week to operational maintenance should probably run a simpler setup; the operational cost can exceed the DD-reduction benefit for hobbyist operators.
тАЬI wanted to see if multi-EA diversification actually works in practice. The answer is yes, but it's a trade-off. The 24% return is good, the 5.8% peak DD is excellent, but I spend three hours a week on operational stuff that a single-EA setup wouldn't require. For my portfolio scale that's worth it; for a smaller hobbyist account it probably isn't.тАЭ
рд╕рддреНрдпрд╛рдкрди: Myfxbook рд╕рд┐рдВрдбрд┐рдХреЗрд╢рди рдХреЗ рд╕рд╛рде рд▓рд╛рдЗрд╡ рдЯреНрд░реЗрдбрд┐рдВрдЧ рдбреИрд╢рдмреЛрд░реНрдб тЖТ
рд╣рдорд╛рд░реЗ рдХреЗрд╕ рд╕реНрдЯрдбреАрдЬ рдореЗрдВ рджрд┐рдЦрд╛рдП рдЧрдП рдЗрди-рд╣рд╛рдЙрд╕ рд╕рд┐рд╕реНрдЯрдо
рд╣рдорд╛рд░реЗ рдХрдИ рд╕рдВрдкрд╛рджрдХреАрдп рдХреЗрд╕ рд╕реНрдЯрдбреАрдЬ рдХреЗ рдкреАрдЫреЗ 5 FxRobotEasy AI рд╕рд┐рд╕реНрдЯрдоред рдкреНрд░рддреНрдпреЗрдХ рдХреЗ рдкрд╛рд╕ рд╕рддреНрдпрд╛рдкрд┐рдд рд▓рд╛рдЗрд╡ рдкреНрд░рджрд░реНрд╢рди рд╣реИ рдФрд░ William Harris рджреНрд╡рд╛рд░рд╛ рд╕рдВрдкрд╛рджрдХреАрдп-рд╕рдореАрдХреНрд╖рд╛ рдХреА рдЧрдИ рд╣реИред
Scalperology AI
рд╡рд┐рд╢реЗрд╖Rules-based M1 scalper with a neural-network entry filter, calibrated on years of XAUUSD tick data. Tier-1 ECN required.
Trendopedia AI
Trend follower with adaptive stop-and-trail across 8 major and minor pairs. Lower volatility profile vs gold scalpers.
Breakopedia AI
Captures London-open volatility expansion with structured breakout rules. Best on Tier-1 ECN with LD4 colocation.
GoldStrike AI
рд╡рд┐рд╢реЗрд╖End-to-end ML model retrained weekly on multi-year XAUUSD tick data. Premium tier with priority developer support.
NightOwl AI
рдирдпрд╛Mean-reversion and range-trading specialist for the quiet Asian sessions. Pairs with low overnight volatility.
рдФрд░ рдХреЗрд╕ рд╕реНрдЯрдбреАрдЬ рджреЗрдЦреЗрдВ
8 рдХреЗрд╕ рд╕реНрдЯрдбреАрдЬ рдИрдорд╛рдирджрд╛рд░ рд╡рд┐рдлрд▓рддрд╛рдУрдВ рдФрд░ рдбреНрд░реЙрдбрд╛рдЙрди рд░рд┐рдХрд╡рд░реА рд╕рд╣рд┐рдд рд╡рд┐рд╡рд┐рдз рдкрд░рд┐рдгрд╛рдореЛрдВ рдХреЛ рдХрд╡рд░ рдХрд░рддреЗ рд╣реИрдВред
рд╕рднреА рдХреЗрд╕ рд╕реНрдЯрдбреАрдЬ рдмреНрд░рд╛рдЙрдЬрд╝ рдХрд░реЗрдВ тЖТ