FxRobotEasy Editorial · Last reviewed
FxRobotEasy vs Myfxbook — Editorial EA Platform vs Trade Verification Network
What is Myfxbook?
Founded 2009
Myfxbook is one of the most widely-used trading account verification and analytics platforms in forex, founded in 2009. Traders connect their MT4 or MT5 accounts via investor password or read-only API, and the platform publishes public profiles with verified equity curves, drawdown statistics, trade-by-trade lists, time-of-day distributions, and many other analytical breakdowns. Verification badges indicate the verification method (trade history vs trading privileges). Beyond verification, Myfxbook operates AutoTrade — a copy-trading service that mirrors strategies from verified providers — and a social network where traders can follow systems, message providers, and discuss performance. The platform is widely accepted as the industry-standard reference for 'show me the live track record' on forex strategies.
What is FxRobotEasy?
Founded 2021
FxRobotEasy is a product-focused editorial platform launched in 2021 by founder William Harris. The company develops four flagship AI-based expert advisors for MetaTrader 5 — Scalperology (XAUUSD scalping), Breakopedia (multi-pair breakout), Trendopedia (trend-following on majors), and GoldStrike (gold momentum). Beyond its own products, FxRobotEasy publishes editorial reviews of ~500 third-party EAs, maintains a verified live trading dashboard powered by Myfxbook syndication, and offers a 30-day money-back guarantee on flagship purchases. The platform uses Myfxbook as one input to its editorial verification process — Myfxbook tracks are surfaced alongside FxRobotEasy's editorial commentary on what the data does and does not prove.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | FxRobotEasy | Myfxbook |
|---|---|---|
| Platform type | Editorial EA reviews + own EA suite + education | Trade verification network + social copy-trading platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2009 |
| Core function | Editorial interpretation of EA performance + EA distribution | Verified trading account statistics + copy-trading via AutoTrade |
| Account verification | Uses Myfxbook syndication for own EAs and selected catalog entries | Native — connects via investor password or read-only API |
| EA reviews | Editorial reviews of ~500 EAs with pros/cons and verification commentary | Community-driven — system pages with stats but no editorial review |
| Own trading products | Yes — 4 flagship EAs + 500+ third-party catalog | No — verification platform; AutoTrade mirrors third-party signals |
| Copy-trading | No native copy-trading | Yes — AutoTrade copies verified providers |
| Educational content | Free 105-lesson course library + how-to guides + glossary | Forum + community wiki; no structured course library |
| Refund / guarantee | 30-day money-back on flagship EAs | Platform is free; AutoTrade subscription terms vary by signal provider |
| Cost to use | Free editorial + paid EA licenses ($79-$249) | Free verification + AutoTrade fees set by signal providers |
| Editorial layer | Independent editorial commentary on EA performance and claims | No editorial layer — data is presented as-is for users to interpret |
Data layer vs interpretation layer
Myfxbook and FxRobotEasy operate at different layers of the EA evaluation stack. Myfxbook is the verification data layer — it answers 'is this trading account real and what are the verified statistics'. FxRobotEasy is the editorial interpretation layer — it answers 'given these statistics, what does this EA actually do, what are the risks, and is it worth buying'.
A Myfxbook profile shows you the equity curve, drawdown, win rate, and trade list — all factual data. It does not tell you whether the win rate comes from grid recovery (high blow-up risk) or genuine edge (sustainable), whether the strategy is exposed to news risk, or whether the vendor's marketing claims match the actual behaviour. That contextual interpretation is what editorial reviews add on top of the verified data.
FxRobotEasy uses Myfxbook syndication as a foundational input. When we review an EA, we look at the Myfxbook track (if one exists), interpret it in the context of strategy class and risk model, surface the things the data does and does not prove, and write that interpretation alongside the data on the EA review page. Both layers are useful; neither replaces the other.
AutoTrade vs FxRobotEasy products
Myfxbook AutoTrade is a copy-trading service — buyers subscribe to a verified signal provider, and the platform mirrors trades from the provider's account to the buyer's account. The model is operationally different from running an EA on your own VPS: the trade decisions happen on the provider's side, latency and slippage depend on the platform's infrastructure, and the buyer pays an ongoing subscription rather than a one-time fee.
FxRobotEasy flagship EAs run on the buyer's own MT5 terminal. Trade decisions happen locally, the buyer controls the broker and account, and the cost is a one-time license rather than per-trade copy fees. This model trades operational simplicity (AutoTrade is plug-and-play) for control and total cost of ownership (running your own EA is cheaper long-term).
Which model fits depends on the trader. AutoTrade is well-suited to traders who want exposure to a verified strategy without managing infrastructure, who are evaluating multiple providers and want easy switching, or who lack a VPS setup. Running an EA on your own terminal is well-suited to traders who want lower long-term cost, full control over execution, and the ability to optimise the EA's parameters for their broker and account size. Many serious algo traders end up running their own EAs after using copy-trading platforms as an entry point.
Editorial use of Myfxbook data
When FxRobotEasy reviews an EA, the editorial process draws on multiple verification sources. Myfxbook is one of the strongest because it is the industry-standard data layer and is hard to fake credibly. Other inputs: MQL5 Signals data (if the vendor publishes there), Forex Peace Army TallyPower (if applicable), the vendor's own backtests with adjustment for known overfitting risks, and FxRobotEasy's own forward-testing on demo or small live accounts.
Myfxbook data has limitations that editorial review can highlight: a track length of 6 months looks like statistically significant evidence but may not have spanned a full market regime; a high win rate paired with widening drawdown can indicate a grid or martingale recovery model that is hiding tail risk; verified statistics from a demo account are weaker evidence than verified statistics from a live account at a regulated broker.
Editorial commentary surfaces these caveats. Myfxbook displays the data; FxRobotEasy reviews tell you what the data is and is not evidence of. The two together are stronger than either alone.
Choose Myfxbook if you
- • You need to verify a specific trading account's live performance independently
- • You want copy-trading rather than running an EA on your own terminal
- • You are publishing your own trading results for clients or social-trading visibility
- • You want raw verification data without editorial interpretation
- • You are comparing many signal providers and need a common verification framework
Choose FxRobotEasy if you
- • You want editorial interpretation alongside the verification data
- • You are specifically researching expert advisors to run on your own terminal
- • You want structured education and how-to guides for automation
- • You are evaluating the FxRobotEasy EA suite directly with the 30-day guarantee
- • You want pros/cons and risk commentary, not just raw statistics
FxRobotEasy
Pros
- ✓ Editorial interpretation alongside Myfxbook verification data on EA reviews
- ✓ 30-day money-back guarantee on flagship EAs (vs ongoing AutoTrade subscriptions)
- ✓ Free structured course library and how-to guides for automation
- ✓ Buyer controls own EA, broker, and execution — no platform intermediary
- ✓ Reviews of ~500 EAs in one curated catalog rather than thousands of signal providers
Cons
- ✗ Does not natively verify trading accounts (we use Myfxbook for that)
- ✗ No copy-trading platform — buyers run EAs on their own MT5
- ✗ Sells our own EAs (conflict of interest on flagship product pages)
- ✗ Smaller community than Myfxbook's verified trader social network
- ✗ Smaller raw catalog than Myfxbook's full set of verified signal providers
Myfxbook
Pros
- ✓ Industry-standard reference for verified live trading data
- ✓ Free public account verification for any retail trader
- ✓ AutoTrade copy-trading platform for low-friction strategy exposure
- ✓ Strong analytics — drawdown breakdown, time-of-day distribution, currency exposure
- ✓ Years of accumulated verified signal providers for cross-reference research
Cons
- ✗ Data layer only — no editorial interpretation of what the statistics mean
- ✗ AutoTrade involves an ongoing subscription rather than one-time purchase
- ✗ Verified data alone does not flag risk-hiding strategies (grid, martingale)
- ✗ Some providers fake credibility through cherry-picked or short-track accounts
- ✗ Comparing dozens of providers requires significant analytical effort
Frequently asked questions
Do I need FxRobotEasy if I already use Myfxbook?
Myfxbook is excellent at what it does — verified statistics, transparent track records, comparison across signal providers. What it does not do is editorial assessment: it will not tell you that an EA's win rate is grid-driven (high tail risk), that the track is too short to span a full market regime, that the vendor's marketing claims are inconsistent with the actual behaviour, or that the EA underperforms similar strategies in its class. FxRobotEasy editorial reviews add that interpretation layer on top of the Myfxbook data. If you are an experienced algo trader who reads equity curves fluently, you may need Myfxbook alone. If you are evaluating EAs you are not familiar with, editorial review of the same data is a useful safety net.
Can I trust Myfxbook-verified data?
Myfxbook's verification methodology is solid for what it claims to verify: trades that actually executed on the connected account. The data is genuinely from the broker, the trade history is real, and the statistics are computed from those trades. What Myfxbook does not (and cannot) verify: whether the connected account represents the strategy being marketed (vendors can connect cherry-picked accounts), whether the broker is reputable (some vendors connect accounts at unregulated brokers where blow-ups can be hidden), whether the account is funded with real money or trading on credit. Look for verification badges, broker reputation, account funding type, and track length. Cross-reference with other sources where possible.
How is Myfxbook AutoTrade different from MQL5 Signals?
Myfxbook AutoTrade and MQL5 Signals overlap substantially in their core function — connecting buyers to verified signal providers and mirroring trades. Differences: provider pools are different (Myfxbook AutoTrade and MQL5 Signals each have their own provider directories with some overlap), fee structures vary (each platform sets terms with providers), and platform integration differs (MQL5 Signals is inside the MetaTrader terminal; AutoTrade runs through Myfxbook's infrastructure). Buyers should evaluate the specific provider rather than the platform — a strong provider on either platform is more important than the platform choice, and a weak provider remains weak regardless of which platform you copy from. FxRobotEasy does not offer copy-trading; we sell EAs that buyers run on their own MT5 terminal.
Is Myfxbook free?
Both platforms make their primary content free. Myfxbook's verification and analytics for your own account are free; the paid layer is AutoTrade (copy-trading) where you pay the signal provider's subscription fee plus any platform fees. FxRobotEasy's editorial, course library, glossary, calculators, and how-to guides are all free; the paid layer is the flagship EA licenses. The cost models are different but neither platform paywalls the research layer.
What is the best workflow combining both platforms?
A reasonable workflow: (1) browse FxRobotEasy editorial reviews for EAs in the strategy class you want (e.g. XAUUSD scalping, EURUSD trend-following). (2) For each candidate, check the Myfxbook track surfaced in the FxRobotEasy review or search Myfxbook directly. (3) Read the editorial pros/cons on FxRobotEasy alongside the raw Myfxbook stats — verify that the editorial commentary matches what you see in the data. (4) Make a purchase decision based on the combined picture. (5) After deploying the EA, connect your own running account to Myfxbook for ongoing verification — your live track over months is the strongest evidence of all. This combined workflow is more rigorous than relying on either platform alone.
Verdict
Myfxbook and FxRobotEasy are not competitors. They are layered infrastructure for the EA buyer's research process. Myfxbook is the verification data layer — the platform that proves trades actually happened and computes the analytics. FxRobotEasy is the editorial interpretation layer — the platform that contextualises what the data means, what risks it hides, and how it compares with other EAs in the same strategy class. A serious EA buyer's research stack typically includes both. Myfxbook alone gives you raw verified data, which is necessary but not sufficient for confident buying decisions; FxRobotEasy editorial alone gives you interpretation that depends on the underlying Myfxbook data being credible. The combination is stronger than either alone, and combining both with other independent sources (community forums, broker regulator checks, demo testing on your own account) is stronger still. For copy-trading specifically, Myfxbook AutoTrade is a different model from running an FxRobotEasy EA on your own terminal — different cost structure, different control, different operational profile. Neither is universally better; the right choice depends on your time horizon, technical setup, and preference for hands-on control versus plug-and-play simplicity. If you came to this page asking 'should I buy an EA from FxRobotEasy or just use Myfxbook to evaluate signal providers', the answer is: it depends on whether you want to run your own EA or copy someone else's. The two paths use the same Myfxbook verification data but lead to different platforms for the actual purchase. There is no winner — the choice is between different operational models, both of which are legitimate.
Try both platforms before deciding
Our 30-day money-back guarantee lets you evaluate FxRobotEasy risk-free.
See our EAs →