RazorQuant AI
by Steffen Schmidt · MT5
Loading...
Loading...
Browse all reviews, rankings, guides, strategies, and trust documents.
Live MetaTrader terminals from FxRobotEasy accounts. Every capture is watermarked and hash-stamped, and opens its own public report.
The player loads from YouTube only after you press play.
Summary
Razor MT5 is an MT5 expert advisor by Anton Kondratev priced at $745 but currently shows a 0/5 rating and no verified live stats, which raises caution. Traders often compare it with alternatives such as ZenQ AI EA ($399, rating 5) or budget-friendly Degen Rocket ($30, rating 4.5). Alternatives with high community ratings may offer better perceived value, but none in this set provide verified track records. Always factor broker rules, spreads, slippage and drawdown risk, run extended demo and forward testing, and apply conservative sizing. FxRobotEasy independently reviews all products on the site.
Retail traders compare Razor MT5 with alternatives because buying an expert advisor is as much about trust and fit as it is about theory. Razor MT5 is an MT5 EA priced at $745 by Anton Kondratev, but it currently carries a 0/5 rating and no verified live statistics. That combination prompts traders to consider cheaper or higher-rated alternatives, to seek verified track records, or to prioritize different features such as adaptability, latency sensitivity, or capital requirements. Comparisons must also account for platform realities: broker rules can block certain order types or restrict hedging, spreads and commissions will affect short-term strategies, and volatile markets magnify drawdown risk. Demo testing, forward testing on small live accounts, and clarity on support, updates, and refund policies are essential. Because none of the entries here include verified performance histories, the focus becomes risk management, compatibility with your broker and VPS setup, and the reputation and responsiveness of the author. FxRobotEasy independently reviews all products to highlight these practical considerations and to help traders match an EA to their account size, risk tolerance, and execution environment.
| Metric | Razor MT5Main Product | Scalperology Ai Our bot | RazorQuant AI | RazgonDepoEA | Rbj12 Gold Sniper | Razgon X |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | 0.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Price | $745 | $149 | N/A | $50 | $499 | $250 |
| ROI | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Max Drawdown | N/A | 12.1% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Win Rate | N/A | 67.2% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Profit Factor | N/A | 2.15 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Total Trades | N/A | 902 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Downloads | 0 | N/A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Links |
ROI, drawdown, win rate, profit factor and trade counts for MQL5 listings are FxRobotEasy modelled Strategy Tester aggregates — simulated, not live or broker-verified. Rating, price and downloads come from the MQL5 Market listing. The FxRobotEasy column is different in kind: those rows are one published trading account, read live from app.fxroboteasy.com at page build, not a modelled run. It is not like-for-like with the columns beside it, and the per-row winner marker compares a live account against simulations. Its rating and downloads are not tracked here.
Razor MT5 is presented as an expert advisor for the MT5 platform authored by Anton Kondratev and offered at a list price of $745. At face value the product sits in a higher price bracket compared with many retail EAs, which can signal advanced features or a niche strategy, but buyers should be cautious because Razor MT5 currently carries a 0/5 rating and no verified performance statistics are available. Without live or third-party verified track records, it is impossible to validate claims about returns, stability or drawdown behavior. Strengths you can reasonably expect from an MT5 EA like this are compatibility with MetaTrader 5, the ability to run continuously on a VPS, and configurable parameters that let experienced traders tune risk. Weaknesses are clearer here: the high price relative to unproven results, an absence of community-verified performance evidence, and the low visible rating, which collectively increase buyer risk. Who might consider Razor MT5? Experienced traders or developers who want to test a new algorithmic approach and who have the budget to pay $745 for a potentially proprietary system might trial it on a demo account first. It could also suit traders who value direct contact with the author and are prepared to request forward-testing or conditional refunds. Who should avoid it? Traders seeking proven, low-cost solutions or those without time for lengthy validation and risk controls should be cautious. Platform realities matter: broker spread, commission structures, execution latency, allowed hedge rules and maximum leverage materially affect EA outcomes. Drawdown risk is real; any EA, including Razor MT5, should be trialed on demo and small live accounts with strict risk management. FxRobotEasy independently reviews all products to point out these gaps and to advise buyers on due diligence before purchase.
by Steffen Schmidt · MT5
by Sergei Vassunov · MT5
by Mauro Mazzacco · MT5
by Mikhail Atarskii · MT5
Razor MT5 presents a high-price, high-uncertainty proposition: $745 for an MT5 EA with a 0/5 rating and no verified live statistics. That combination argues for caution. Among alternatives, ZenQ AI EA and the Pyro Flux Liquidity Matrix list stronger community ratings, while Degen Rocket stands out as a low-cost experiment option. None of the options provide verified performance data, so the decision should rest on price sensitivity, trust in the author, support expectations and a trader’s willingness to run extended demos. Platform realities—broker spreads, latency, order execution and drawdown—will determine real-world results regardless of vendor claims. Practical next steps: demo-test any candidate, run forward live testing with conservative sizing, and request vendor-provided forward logs or refund terms. FxRobotEasy independently reviews all products and also offers its own verified bots as an alternative for traders who prioritize documented performance and independent verification.
With a list price of $745, a 0/5 rating and no verified live statistics, Razor MT5 should be treated cautiously. It may be worth considering only if you have the budget for due diligence, access to demo testing, and are prepared to request forward-test data or a refund policy from the author. Prioritize broker compatibility, VPS hosting, and strict position sizing during any live test.
Best depends on priorities. ZenQ AI EA stands out for a 5 rating and lower price ($399), while Degen Rocket is attractive for low-cost experimentation at $30. Pyro Flux and Gold Sparrow also have high ratings but lack price disclosure. None provide verified performance, so the ‘best’ alternative is the one you validate through demo and forward testing that fits your broker and risk tolerance.
Start on a demo account with the same broker and server settings you plan to use live. Use a VPS for consistent execution, log trades and account metrics, and perform multi-week forward testing. When moving to live, scale in with small lot sizes, apply strict stop-loss rules and never risk more than your predefined percentage per trade. Validate across several market conditions.
Yes. Broker execution, spreads, commissions, allowed hedging and slippage can materially change an EA’s edge, especially for scalping or high-frequency strategies. Wide spreads and slow fills increase costs and drawdowns. Confirm recommended broker types with the vendor, test on accounts that match your intended live environment, and include commission and spread costs in performance expectations.
Seek third-party verified track records with clear timeframes, drawdown metrics, average trade duration, win rate, risk-adjusted returns and consistent trade volumes. Prefer accounts hosted on reputable verification platforms, and check for long enough sample sizes across different market regimes. Absence of such verification means you must rely on extended demo and cautious live testing.
While evaluating Razor MT5 and its alternatives, consider Scalperology Ai, developed by FxRobotEasy. Its review page covers the strategy, settings and the published trading accounts. The figures below come from one published account, read live from app.fxroboteasy.com; the date they were computed is shown with them, and they are absent when that account has no closed trades to report.
12.1%
Max Drawdown
67%
Win Rate
902
Total Trades