Simple Win Rate Tracker
by Martijn Johan Blok · MT5
Loading...
Browse all reviews, rankings, guides, strategies, and trust documents.
Live MetaTrader terminals from FxRobotEasy accounts. Every capture is watermarked and hash-stamped, and opens its own public report.
The player loads from YouTube only after you press play.
Summary
Simple Trading Manager is an MT5 expert advisor by Yahia Mohamed Hassan Mohamed with no price listed, a 0/5 rating, and no verified performance stats. That lack of published data makes it hard to prefer over better-documented rivals. Alternatives such as ZenQ AI EA ($399, 5/5), Pyro Flux Liquidity Matrix (rating 5), Gold Sparrow (rating 5), Degen Rocket ($30, 4.5/5), and Superior Trader ($499, 4.25/5) offer clearer value propositions based on stated ratings and pricing. Traders should weigh broker constraints, spreads, and drawdown risk, and consult FxRobotEasy’s independent reviews before testing on a demo account.
Traders compare Simple Trading Manager against other expert advisors because the MT5 EA market is crowded and product listings often omit critical real-world evidence. Simple Trading Manager is authored by Yahia Mohamed Hassan Mohamed and listed for MT5, but its public profile includes a 0/5 rating, no price, and no verified performance statistics. That combination forces traders to rely on feature descriptions, code transparency, or third-party reviews when deciding whether to test the EA. Alternatives on the same platform vary widely in price and reported ratings; for example, ZenQ AI EA lists a $399 price and a 5/5 rating while Degen Rocket is priced at $30 with a 4.5/5 rating. Comparing these options helps traders identify which EAs match their capital, risk tolerance, broker constraints, and acceptable maintenance effort. Remember that MT5 EAs operate under broker rules: spreads, commission structures, minimum stop distances, and order execution quality all materially affect results. Drawdowns and slippage are real risks that can overwhelm any strategy if not managed. FxRobotEasy independently reviews all products listed on the site, and we recommend demo testing with your broker’s execution conditions before running any EA on a funded account.
| Metric | Simple Trading ManagerMain Product | Trendopedia Ai Our bot | Simple Win Rate Tracker | Simple Trading Lot Panel | SinalTradeToMT5 | Simple Trade Panel by Algostein |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | 0.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Price | N/A | $149 | N/A | $49 | $199 | N/A |
| ROI | N/A | +291.1% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Max Drawdown | N/A | 22.0% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Win Rate | N/A | 56.4% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Profit Factor | N/A | 1.48 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Total Trades | N/A | 429 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Downloads | 0 | N/A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Links |
ROI, drawdown, win rate, profit factor and trade counts for MQL5 listings are FxRobotEasy modelled Strategy Tester aggregates — simulated, not live or broker-verified. Rating, price and downloads come from the MQL5 Market listing. The FxRobotEasy column is different in kind: those rows are one published trading account, read live from app.fxroboteasy.com at page build, not a modelled run. It is not like-for-like with the columns beside it, and the per-row winner marker compares a live account against simulations. Its rating and downloads are not tracked here.
Simple Trading Manager is presented as an MT5 expert advisor authored by Yahia Mohamed Hassan Mohamed. Publicly available details are sparse: the price is not listed (N/A), the rating is 0/5, and there are no verified performance statistics. Strengths are therefore primarily conceptual rather than proven: being an MT5 EA means it can be automated, run continuously, and be backtested within MT5 strategy tester. It may include trade management, risk sizing, and position controls typical of a “trading manager” EA, which can benefit traders who want consistent rule-based order handling rather than manual supervision. Weaknesses stem directly from the missing data. Without a price, verified track record, or credible third-party results, it is difficult to assess real-world performance, robustness across market regimes, or how it handles spreads, slippage, and broker-specific order execution rules. The 0/5 rating on the listing indicates either a new listing, lack of reviews, or insufficient information for users to score it positively. Who it suits: technically inclined traders who are prepared to inspect code, perform extensive backtests, and run the EA on demo accounts to validate behavior. It may also suit those who want to modify or integrate a trade management script into a broader system. Who should be cautious: traders seeking turnkey, well-documented paid EAs with published statistics and community proof. Platform realities matter: broker spreads, commissions, minimum distance to stops, and server execution latency can turn a promising backtest into poor live outcomes. Drawdown risk is inherent with all EAs; conservative risk settings and robust stop management are essential. Finally, FxRobotEasy independently reviews all products, and we advise demo testing and careful due diligence before deploying any EA live.
by Martijn Johan Blok · MT5
by Taihei Kono · MT5
by Angelo Marcelo Serafin · MT5
by Doniyor Axmadjonov · MT5
Simple Trading Manager is difficult to recommend as a front-line choice because key decision data are missing: price is N/A, rating is 0/5, and there are no verified statistics. That lack of transparency forces traders to treat it as a technical artifact requiring deep inspection and extensive demo testing rather than a turn-key solution. The listed alternatives offer clearer starting points: ZenQ AI EA, Pyro Flux, and Gold Sparrow each carry a 5/5 rating, Degen Rocket is an inexpensive trial option at $30 with 4.5/5, and Superior Trader targets premium buyers at $499. Regardless of selection, broker-specific realities—spreads, execution, margin and stop distance rules—will determine live results. FxRobotEasy independently reviews all products listed on the site, and our vetted FxRobotEasy bots can be considered as verified alternatives. Final advice: prioritize demo testing, validate claims with your broker conditions, and manage position sizing to limit drawdown risk before going live.
At present, Simple Trading Manager shows a 0/5 rating, no listed price, and no verified performance statistics. That makes a straight purchase risky unless you can inspect the code, obtain a trial, or secure demonstrable results from the author. Consider demo testing, request documentation, and verify behavior under your broker’s spreads and latency before buying. If you prefer proven options, evaluate the listed alternatives with clearer pricing or ratings.
There is no single best alternative; it depends on priorities. ZenQ AI EA ($399, 5/5) and Pyro Flux (5/5) present high listed ratings and are suitable for traders wanting polished offerings. Degen Rocket ($30, 4.5/5) is good for low-cost trials. Superior Trader ($499, 4.25/5) aims at premium buyers. None have verified independent stats, so demo testing and due diligence under your broker conditions are essential.
Always start on a demo account that matches your live broker’s execution conditions: same leverage, spreads, and account type. Backtest with realistic tick data if available, forward-test on a demo for several weeks or months, and monitor drawdowns and slippage. Use conservative position sizing initially and check how the EA handles news, gaps, and weekend risk. Keep logs and compare reported results with broker statements.
Verified statistics from independent sources provide objective insight into live performance, drawdowns, and real-world execution. Without them, you must rely on seller claims and marketplace ratings, which can be biased. Verified track records help assess robustness across market regimes and reveal issues like curve-fitting. Prioritize EAs with transparent, repeatable live results or be prepared to perform your own rigorous testing.
Yes. Broker rules such as minimum distance to stop orders, commission structures, swap rates, spread variability, and order execution quality directly affect an EA’s outcomes. Strategies that look profitable in backtests can fail in live trading if spread costs or slippage are higher than assumed. Always validate an EA using your intended broker’s demo environment and account settings to see how execution impacts returns and drawdowns.
While evaluating Simple Trading Manager and its alternatives, consider Trendopedia Ai, developed by FxRobotEasy. Its review page covers the strategy, settings and the published trading accounts. The figures below come from one published account, read live from app.fxroboteasy.com; the date they were computed is shown with them, and they are absent when that account has no closed trades to report.
+291.1%
Total Return
22.0%
Max Drawdown
56%
Win Rate
429
Total Trades